Downey v. Instaloans Financial Systems Centres McLennan Ross acted when it comes to Defendants in this course action commenced in Ontario against a payday lender, that has been settled included in the general settlement associated with Ontario and Alberta course procedures against our customers. The settlement agreements had been authorized because of the Courts in Ontario and Alberta.
Fong et al v. Grenville-Germain Calgary Limited Partnership McLennan Ross acted when it comes to directors of the business which constructed an extravagance condominium/hotel/office complex within an action commenced with respect to the owners of the domestic condominiums for misrepresentations and inadequacies.
Hudyma v. LoyaltyOne, Inc. et al McLennan Ross acted for the transportation that is international with regards to an action involving a big travel facilitator additionally the incorporation of gas surcharges into the calculation of costs.
Kilroy v. a okay payday loans inc. et al it was A uk Columbia class action against lots of pay day loan operations, by which McLennan Ross represented three associated with the Defendants. The Plaintiff discontinued its action against our consumers.
Korte v. Cormie McLennan Ross had been counsel towards the auditors in this course of action, a proceeding that is“representative ahead of the utilization of course procedures legislation in Alberta, that was brought with respect to all the investors in 2 subsidiaries for the Principal Group, an economic conglomerate that failed. The situation ended up being settled just before exams for breakthrough.
Lahaie v. Goodyear this is a course action against Goodyear
McLennan Ross assisted as Alberta counsel in commencing the course action in Alberta in the request of British Columbia counsel, that has currently commenced an action in British Columbia. The situation had been settled in British Columbia.
MacKinnon v. National cash Mart et al This course action had been brought in British Columbia contrary to the major operators into the cash advance industry. McLennan Ross ended up being counsel to at least one regarding the Defendants. We had been effective in opposing a credit card applicatoin for official official official official certification, following that the Plaintiff discontinued this step as against our consumers.
Nette v. Stiles et al In this proposed class action, the Plaintiff advertised from the Alberta national while the College of Chiropractors that one therapy ended up being harmful and really should never be allowed when you look at the Province of Alberta. McLennan Ross represented a Defendant and brought a software to truly have the claim dismissed just before certification. The Plaintiff discontinued against our customer ahead of the application had been argued.
O’Keefe v. Menu Foods working Limited Partnership McLennan Ross ended up being taking part in a course action brought by owners alleging this one regarding the major suppliers of pet meals in Alberta didn’t have quality settings set up which lead to the loss of home animals from tainted meals. This litigation ended up being fixed by settlement among the events.
Pauli et al v. Ace INA Insurance et al McLennan Ross acted as Alberta counsel for starters associated with Defendants in this step which desired an interpretation associated with Insurance Act and a return of any deductible charged where there is a loss that is total of at issue. The action had been remedied in preference of the Defendants after a synopsis dedication of the true point of legislation.
Ramias v. Johnson McLennan Ross had been counsel towards the Plaintiffs in this class that is putative which stated investment fraudulence and securities violations. It had been discontinued after settlement utilizing the Defendants.
Tschritter v. Instaloans Financial Systems Centres McLennan Ross had been counsel into the Defendants in this class action brought against a payday financial institution in the Province of Alberta, that was remedied within the general settlement associated with the Ontario and Alberta course procedures against our customers (see Bruley and Downey above).
Western Canada Buying Centres v. Dutton McLennan Ross acted for just one associated with defendants in this longstanding course action for several years.
1023926 Alberta Ltd. v. Bank of America et al Class actions have already been filed against Visa, MasterCard, and lots of finance institutions in British Columbia, Alberta, Quebec and Ontario, claiming losings with respect to Canadian merchants who accepted re re payment for items or solutions by means of Visa or MasterCard charge cards pertaining to solution charges and limitations on company techniques that have been needed to be able to accept such repayments. McLennan Ross will act as Alberta representative for counsel for starters associated with the Defendant banking institutions. The things are at the mercy of case that is coordinated and tend to be ongoing.
Alexander and Barrett v. HMS Financial et al McLennan Ross is co-counsel when it comes to Plaintiffs with regards to a nationwide and cross-border course action alleging securities fraudulence. This course of action ended up being certified as against many specific and business Defendants, including major institutions that are financial. We now have restored a few million bucks for the course people.
Bird v. Blott & Associates et al McLennan Ross is representing among the Defendants in this proposed course action on the part of a wide range of domestic college claimants. We now have simply filed a declaration of Defence while the action have not yet been certified.
Covidien LLC McLennan Ross is representing Covidien LLC in 2 course actions brought by people who had urinary mesh implanted. Covidien is certainly one supplier (amongst many named manufacturers and suppliers) of the item in Canada. The litigation mirrors comparable class actions brought in america.
L’Hirondelle v Medicentres An $11 million course action lawsuit happens to be filed more than a lacking laptop containing individual and wellness information of 620,000 Albertans. The lawsuit alleges Medicentres neglected to protect information that is private had been negligent in using a lot more than four months to see the general public in regards to the privacy breach. McLennan Ross is counsel into the IT consulting firm, whom employed the IT consultant whom owned the missing laptop computer.
Phillips and Wournell v. Image (Topco) companies Limited et al This proposed class proceeding in British Columbia, associated with the Tracy action below, is brought against people and entities alleging conveyance that is fraudulent of relating to the ongoing Tracy payday advances course proceeding. Defence of the action is ongoing.
Poseidon Concepts Corp. McLennan Ross is lead counsel to your auditors of Poseidon Concepts Corp. (Poseidon) in a shareholder course action claim in Alberta for $650 million, along with associated actions filed in Alberta, Ontario, Quebec, and nyc. The events mixed up in different disputes, as well as the Plaintiff investors, consist of: Poseidon through its Monitor, Underwriters, a Lending Syndicate of chartered banking institutions, a predecessor online payday loans Alabama corporation that is public additionally the directors and officers of Poseidon.
Tracy v. Instaloans Financial Solution Centres McLennan Ross is counsel to your Defendants in course action procedures when you look at the Province of British Columbia. The course action alleges that the Defendant payday loan providers had been operated unlawfully and claims damages within the tens of vast amounts. Defence regarding the proceeding continues subsequent to its official certification as a course action.